{"id":441,"date":"2025-03-28T12:37:11","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T13:37:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gogetterlifestylebrand.com\/?p=441"},"modified":"2025-03-31T11:18:41","modified_gmt":"2025-03-31T11:18:41","slug":"trump-would-see-firing-waltz-as-giving-in-to-the-media-haberman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gogetterlifestylebrand.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/28\/trump-would-see-firing-waltz-as-giving-in-to-the-media-haberman\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump would see firing Waltz as ‘giving in to the media’: Haberman"},"content":{"rendered":"
New York Times political correspondent Maggie Haberman weighed in on why she believes President Trump is defending national security adviser Mike Waltz over the Signal group chat<\/a> breach, suggesting the rhetoric is an effort to stiff media outlets<\/a> and their portrayal of the controversy<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cTrump is very clear that, according to a number of people I\u2019ve spoken to, he does not want to fire someone, because he sees that as giving in to the media,\u201d Haberman said Thursday during an appearance on CNN\u2019s “The Source with Kaitlan Collins.”<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cPeople around him see that as weak,” she added. “And I think you will hear that for a while. Whether this is sustainable for them is another story.”<\/p>\n Waltz admitted to adding<\/a> The Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg to the message thread <\/a>where attack plans about strikes in Yemen were being discussed<\/a> among senior Trump administration officials, including Waltz, Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.\u00a0<\/p>\n Goldberg released the full messages<\/a> of the war plans to the public Wednesday.<\/p>\n \u201cI didn\u2019t see this loser in the group. It looked like someone else,\u201d Waltz told Fox News’s Laura Ingraham earlier this week, referring to Goldberg.\u00a0\u201cNow, whether he did it deliberately or it happened in some other technical mean, is something we\u2019re trying to figure out.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Despite concerns from former defense officials, Trump has reiterated that he maintains<\/a> full confidence in Waltz and, like others in<\/a> the administration has seemingly brushed off<\/a> the incident as a “mistake.”<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cMichael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he\u2019s a good man,\u201d Trump told NBC, adding that the security breach was \u201cthe only glitch in two months, and it turned out not to be a serious one.\u201d<\/p>\n House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has similarly argued<\/a> that Waltz and Hegseth, who has also taken heat<\/a> over the incident, should not be punished.<\/p>\n